If upgrading RAM or accessing the M.2 SSD is the reason for your disassembly, then ready your patience.Ĭarefully unscrew the few screws around on the motherboard along with the cooling fans on the sides. There’s also easy access to the Wi-Fi card – Intel 3165NGW. As we stated earlier, for the Core i5-7Y54 we used Acer’s Swift 7 ultrabook while the results for the Core m5-6Y54 were taken from the recently reviewed ASUS ZenBook Flip UX360CA. This is a clear sign that the Acer wasn’t able to utilize the processor.Īnd here are the benchmarks. As you can see in the screenshot below, the CPU reached a maximum of 2.2 GHz and quickly toned down to 1.8-1.9 GHz. To our surprise, the Core i5-7Y54 didn’t reach its maximum frequency of 3.2 GHz – it didn’t even get close to that. In order to investigate the issue further, we ran the usual CPU stress test to see how far the SoC goes with two active cores. Clearly, there should be a significant performance increase only by looking at the specs sheets. Either way, the benchmarks show little to no difference between this year’s Core i5-7Y54 and last year’s Core m5-6Y54. Since this is the first Core i5-7Y54 CPU that we test, we can’t be 100% sure whether there’s a problem with the CPU itself or Acer wasn’t able to utilize the full potential of the SoC. And by now, we thought the Kaby Lake generation of fan-less SoCs will be more refined. Then, with the release of Skylake processors, Intel pledged to sort things out and tighten the strings around its Core m processors by giving more strict guidelines to OEMs to ensure identical performance across all devices. We saw a significant difference in performance between identical Core m processors back when the lineup was born with the Broadwell generation. You may find some of the available models with Core i5-7Y54 here: Compared to its direct predecessor, the Core m5-6Y54 (Skylake), the new chip doesn’t go any further in terms of performance… at all. Our end-user Acer Swift 7 sample, which we snatched directly from the retailer, doesn’t seem to utilize the full potential of the Core i5-7Y54 (Kaby Lake) CPU. Stay tuned for the full review of the model with more information regarding the screen quality, battery life, performance, etc. The model number is N156HGE-EAL manufactured by INNOLUX and test results further confirm these claims as they are identical to the ones we got earlier this year. And since this is a TN panel, its viewing angles are unsatisfactory as well.Īnother interesting find is the fact that the considerably more expensive MSI PX60 uses the same TN panel that we found in the Acer Aspire V 15 (V3-575G) and the V5-591 models. However, color temperature is deviating while the contrast ratio and maximum brightness are subpar – 390:K. Our tests from the lab show decent readings in some aspects like 100% sRGB color gamut coverage and accurate color reproduction out of the box. The notebook plays in the same ballpark as some other 15-inch multimedia alternatives like the ASUS ROG GL552VW, ASUS N552VX, Acer Aspire V15 Nitro Black Edition, Lenovo Y700 and Dell’s Inspiron 7559 but eventually struggles to keep up with image quality. You can find some of the available models here: However, the notebook delivers only the former. From a notebook that’s been marketed as gaming/workstation/multimedia device, you’d expect excellent sound and picture quality. If you read our first impressions of the MSI PX60 you would have noticed our disappointment in the company going with a budget TN panel instead of going all the way with an IPS screen.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |